Volume 6, Number 8, Article 3, Pages 791-804 doi:10.1167/6.8.3 http://journalofvision.org/6/8/3/ ISSN 1534-7362
Learning to discriminate complex movements: Biological versus artificial trajectories
Jan Jastorff
Laboratory for Action Representation and Learning, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University Clinic, Tübingen, Germany
[home] [e-mail]
Zoe Kourtzi
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany, & Birmingham University, School of Psychology, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
[home] [e-mail]
Martin A. Giese
Laboratory for Action Representation and Learning, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University Clinic, Tübingen, Germany
[home] [e-mail]
Abstract

The recognition of complex body movements and actions is a fundamental visual capacity very important for social communication. It seems possible that movement recognition is based on a general capability of the visual system to learn complex visual motion patterns. Alternatively, this visual function might exploit specialized mechanisms for the analysis of biologically relevant movements, for example, of humans or animals. To investigate this question, we trained human observers to discriminate novel motion patterns that were generated, exploiting a new technique for stimulus generation by motion morphing. We tested the learning of different classes of novel movement stimuli. One group of stimuli was fully consistent with human movements. A second class of stimuli was based on artificial skeleton models that were inconsistent with human and animal bodies. A third group of stimuli specified the same local motion information as human movements but was inconsistent with an underlying articulated shape. Participants learned both classes of articulated movements very fast in an orientation-dependent manner. Learning speed and accuracy were strikingly similar and independent of the similarity of the stimuli with biologically relevant body shapes. For the class of stimuli without underlying articulated shape, however, we did not observe significant improvements of the discrimination performance after training. Our results indicate the existence of a fast visual learning process for complex articulated movement patterns, which likely is relevant for biological motion perception. This process seems to operate independently of the consistency of the patterns with biologically relevant body shapes but seems to require the compatibility of the learned movements with a global underlying shape.

View full-text

History
Received November 25, 2005; published July 14, 2006
Citation
Jastorff, J., Kourtzi, Z., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Learning to discriminate complex movements: Biological versus artificial trajectories. Journal of Vision, 6(8):3, 791-804, http://journalofvision.org/6/8/3/, doi:10.1167/6.8.3.
Keywords
biological motion, perceptual learning, motion morphing, movement recognition, visual learning, discrimination
Downloads
363 Total; 0.462 /day (DemandFactor)
 
Search
for related articles by these authors
for papers that cite this paper
Get citation






jov