Volume 8, Number 2, Article 8, Pages 1-14 doi:10.1167/8.2.8 http://journalofvision.org/8/2/8/ ISSN 1534-7362
Contrast and stimulus information effects in rapid learning of a visual task
Craig K. Abbey
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, & Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
[home] [e-mail]
Binh T. Pham
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
[home] [e-mail]
Steven S. Shimozaki
School of Psychology, University of Leicester, UK
[home] [e-mail]
Miguel P. Eckstein
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
[home] [e-mail]
Abstract

We have previously described a psychophysical paradigm for investigating rapid learning of relevant visual information in detection tasks (M. P. Eckstein, C. K. Abbey, B. T. Pham, & S. S. Shimozaki, 2004). This paradigm uses blocked trials with a set of possible target profiles, and it has demonstrated learning effects after a single trial. When targets are masked by Gaussian luminance noise, there exists a Bayesian ideal observer that also exhibits learning effects over the trials within a block. In this work, we investigate the effect of target contrast and the effect of the information to be learned in the target profile set. Absolute efficiency tracks target contrast closely and ranges from approximately 10% to 25% in these experiments. To disambiguate learning from other effects contributing to absolute efficiency, we define a measure of learning efficiency that measures the observed improvement over a block of trials against the total improvement expected in the ideal observer. We find significant positive trends in learning efficiency both over contrast and the within-block trial number. We find that a two-feature profile set containing orientation and polarity differences leads to a greater within-block gain in performance than a one-feature profile set that contains only orientation differences. However, this apparent difference disappears when efficiency is compared. Lastly, we show that the disparity between task performance and accumulated knowledge of the target profile can be largely explained by a model that only allows learning to occur in trials the observer performs correctly.

View full-text

History
Received October 24, 2006; published February 21, 2008
Citation
Abbey, C. K., Pham, B. T., Shimozaki, S. S., & Eckstein, M. P. (2008). Contrast and stimulus information effects in rapid learning of a visual task. Journal of Vision, 8(2):8, 1-14, http://journalofvision.org/8/2/8/, doi:10.1167/8.2.8.
Keywords
perceptual learning, ideal observer, learning efficiency, stimulus information, contrast effects
Downloads
181 Total; 0.230 /day (DemandFactor)
 
Search
for articles that cite this paper
for related articles by these authors
for papers that cite this paper
Get citation






jov