Volume 8, Number 6, Abstract 288, Page 288a doi:10.1167/8.6.288 http://journalofvision.org/8/6/288/ ISSN 1534-7362
Spatial scale models of lightness illusions: contrast, anchoring, and tunable filters
Arthur Shapiro
Department of Psychology, Bucknell University, and Program in Neuroscience, Bucknell University
[e-mail]
Emily Knight
Program in Neuroscience, Bucknell University
Zhong-Lin Lu
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California
Abstract

Shapiro, Smith and Knight (2007) showed that most lightness illusions can be generated from the input images by removing their low spatial frequencies content. They suggested that the visual system eliminates spatial frequencies lower than the fundamental frequency of the area of interest. Here, we extend this account in three ways: 1. We show that removing the low spatial frequency energy is algebraically very similar to many existing contrast models (i.e., contrast computed over a region, followed by a two-branch non-linearity). With appropriate specifications, contrast models can account for many well-known lightness illusions, including Adelson's snake and checker-shadow illusions, the white shadow illusion, Anderson and Winawer illusions, Bressan's Dungeon illusion, gradient-gradient illusions, and test spots placed on natural images. 2. We present lightness demonstrations that cannot be explained by an anchoring rule that ascribes "White" to the highest global luminance, but can be explained by anchoring "White" to the maximum output of an array of contrast filters. The demonstrations are based on Adelson's checker-shadow illusion with the cylinder removed (see www.shapirolab.net). We show that when the luminance of the square in the shadow is increased, the square is perceived as white even when other lights in the global environment have higher luminance levels. 3. We present demonstrations that contain test areas of different spatial scales; a model based on a single cut-off spatial frequency cannot account for lightness variations at all spatial scales simultaneously We therefore propose a model with tunable high-pass cut-off or in which contrast is calculated over a tunable integration area. We discuss whether the filters adjust to local organizational factors (edges, grouping, scission and attention factors) or whether the model can be driven by a process that favors the spatial frequency channel that gives the maximum response within a local region (a winner-take-all model).
Supported by NEI.

History
Received April 22, 2008; published May 10, 2008
Citation
Shapiro, A., Knight, E., & Lu, Z.-L. (2008). Spatial scale models of lightness illusions: contrast, anchoring, and tunable filters [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):288, 288a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/288/, doi:10.1167/8.6.288.
Keywords
None
On-Line Presentation
for articles that cite this paper
for related articles by these authors
for papers that cite this paper
Get citation
Get help with this






jov