 |
| Volume 9, Number 3, Article 1, Pages 1-13 |
doi:10.1167/9.3.1 |
http://journalofvision.org/9/3/1/ |
ISSN 1534-7362 |
Task precision at transfer determines specificity of perceptual learning
Pamela E. Jeter |
Memory Attention Perception (MAP) Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Sciences, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA |
|
Barbara Anne Dosher |
Memory Attention Perception (MAP) Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA |
|
Alexander Petrov |
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA |
|
Zhong-Lin Lu |
Laboratory of Brain Processes (LOBES), Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA |
|
Abstract
Perceptual learning, the improvement in performance with practice, reflects plasticity in the adult visual system. We challenge a standard claim that specificity of perceptual learning depends on task difficulty during training, instead showing that specificity, or conversely transfer, is primarily controlled by the precision demands (i.e., orientation difference) of the transfer task. Thus, for an orientation discrimination task, transfer of performance improvement is observed in low-precision transfer tasks, while specificity of performance improvement is observed in high-precision transfer tasks, regardless of the precision of initial training. The nature of specificity places important constraints on mechanisms of transfer in visual learning. These results contribute to understanding generalization of practiced improvements that may be key to the development of expertise and for applications in remediation.
|
|